<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Why Page Rank is not useful</title> <atom:link href="http://nostatus.com/web/why-page-rank-is-not-useful.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://nostatus.com/web/why-page-rank-is-not-useful.html</link> <description>Affiliate marketing, SEO and Online Gaming.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:00:51 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: btard deleted nostatus</title><link>http://nostatus.com/web/why-page-rank-is-not-useful.html#comment-253809</link> <dc:creator>btard deleted nostatus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:31:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nostatus.com/?p=425#comment-253809</guid> <description>[...] reading a post I wrote about Google Page Rank being garbage and noticed that someone mentioned the word &#8216;moot&#8217; and in context - [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reading a post I wrote about Google Page Rank being garbage and noticed that someone mentioned the word &#8216;moot&#8217; and in context &#8211; [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://nostatus.com/web/why-page-rank-is-not-useful.html#comment-214418</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:50:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nostatus.com/?p=425#comment-214418</guid> <description>case.edu is now 7/10 ... PR is some kind of useless in my opinion ...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>case.edu is now 7/10 &#8230; PR is some kind of useless in my opinion &#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: btard</title><link>http://nostatus.com/web/why-page-rank-is-not-useful.html#comment-214415</link> <dc:creator>btard</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 07:26:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nostatus.com/?p=425#comment-214415</guid> <description>Yeah, we&#039;ve had this conversation a few times on MSN. I&#039;ve been writing on forums about the relative uselessness of PR. Enjoy the long weekend. What is there to do on BC day?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, we&#39;ve had this conversation a few times on MSN. I&#39;ve been writing on forums about the relative uselessness of PR. Enjoy the long weekend. What is there to do on BC day?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dan Nedelko</title><link>http://nostatus.com/web/why-page-rank-is-not-useful.html#comment-214414</link> <dc:creator>Dan Nedelko</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 03:20:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nostatus.com/?p=425#comment-214414</guid> <description>The horrid green little bar is a marketing tool. Period. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are is the Algorithmic PageRank (which has no upper limit) and the marketing PageRank (which is the 0-10). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Any further investigation of it having relevance beyond CPM based advertising sales is moot. Have a read:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://infolab.stanford.edu/%7Ebackrub/google.html&quot;&gt;http://infolab.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also keep in mind Case Western University is classed on an EDU IP block which will also be considered of high quality (much easier to attain that magical 0-10) as opposed to a Commercial site. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Have a great long weekend.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The horrid green little bar is a marketing tool. Period.</p><p>There are is the Algorithmic PageRank (which has no upper limit) and the marketing PageRank (which is the 0-10).</p><p>Any further investigation of it having relevance beyond CPM based advertising sales is moot. Have a read:</p><p><a
href="http://infolab.stanford.edu/%7Ebackrub/google.html">http://infolab.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html</a></p><p>Also keep in mind Case Western University is classed on an EDU IP block which will also be considered of high quality (much easier to attain that magical 0-10) as opposed to a Commercial site.</p><p>Have a great long weekend.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: btard</title><link>http://nostatus.com/web/why-page-rank-is-not-useful.html#comment-214417</link> <dc:creator>btard</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:27:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nostatus.com/?p=425#comment-214417</guid> <description>Heidi, thanks for the comments. I get a lot of value from people&#039;s opinions when I actually try to write a critical post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I imagine I should have noted that obtaining high PR is not usually possible with niche sites. To quote Google:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;In essence, Google interprets a link from page A to page B as a vote, by page A, for page B. But, Google looks at more than the sheer volume of votes, or links a page receives; it also analyzes the page that casts the vote. Votes cast by pages that are themselves &quot;important&quot; weigh more heavily and help to make other pages &quot;important&quot;.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess if you don&#039;t have a globally popular site then you won&#039;t get that inbound link thing happening, however, your site still may be the authority on &quot;Blue Widgets&quot; and thus shouldn&#039;t Google at least acknowledge it? I don&#039;t know, just asking questions. For me, being top in the search engines for key phrases is more important to me than that horrid little green bar :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW. I don&#039;t know if this is a localized thing but I&#039;m seeing case.edu as having 8/10 PR.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heidi, thanks for the comments. I get a lot of value from people&#39;s opinions when I actually try to write a critical post.</p><p>I imagine I should have noted that obtaining high PR is not usually possible with niche sites. To quote Google:</p><p>&#8220;In essence, Google interprets a link from page A to page B as a vote, by page A, for page B. But, Google looks at more than the sheer volume of votes, or links a page receives; it also analyzes the page that casts the vote. Votes cast by pages that are themselves &#8220;important&#8221; weigh more heavily and help to make other pages &#8220;important&#8221;.&#8221;</p><p>I guess if you don&#39;t have a globally popular site then you won&#39;t get that inbound link thing happening, however, your site still may be the authority on &#8220;Blue Widgets&#8221; and thus shouldn&#39;t Google at least acknowledge it? I don&#39;t know, just asking questions. For me, being top in the search engines for key phrases is more important to me than that horrid little green bar :)</p><p>BTW. I don&#39;t know if this is a localized thing but I&#39;m seeing case.edu as having 8/10 PR.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Heidi Cool</title><link>http://nostatus.com/web/why-page-rank-is-not-useful.html#comment-214416</link> <dc:creator>Heidi Cool</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:12:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nostatus.com/?p=425#comment-214416</guid> <description>I think Page Rank should be considered on a relative scale. You may be the top blue widget distributor, but if blue widgets are a niche market you&#039;re just never going to get a Page Rank of 9 like we have for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.case.edu&quot;&gt;http://www.case.edu&lt;/a&gt;. Your small company site, no matter how wonderful, just won&#039;t have the breadth of content that draws inbound links the way a large university or corporate site would. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That&#039;s O.K. though because you&#039;re not competing with Case, you&#039;re only competing with other Blue Widget folks. In that category perhaps 4 is considered very high. My blog, which is a bit over 3 years old now has a rank of 6. I host it on the Case blog server, so I gain benefit from the association with the university. Also as I&#039;ve created more content there is more to link to and many of my readers have been kind enough to Stumble or link to my pages. But even if I were to blog every day, and if each of those entries was brilliant, I still don&#039;t think I&#039;d come close to a 9. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;p.s. I downloaded the Google Toolbar to get the Pagerank to show up in my browser.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Page Rank should be considered on a relative scale. You may be the top blue widget distributor, but if blue widgets are a niche market you&#39;re just never going to get a Page Rank of 9 like we have for <a
href="http://www.case.edu">http://www.case.edu</a>. Your small company site, no matter how wonderful, just won&#39;t have the breadth of content that draws inbound links the way a large university or corporate site would.</p><p>That&#39;s O.K. though because you&#39;re not competing with Case, you&#39;re only competing with other Blue Widget folks. In that category perhaps 4 is considered very high. My blog, which is a bit over 3 years old now has a rank of 6. I host it on the Case blog server, so I gain benefit from the association with the university. Also as I&#39;ve created more content there is more to link to and many of my readers have been kind enough to Stumble or link to my pages. But even if I were to blog every day, and if each of those entries was brilliant, I still don&#39;t think I&#39;d come close to a 9.</p><p>p.s. I downloaded the Google Toolbar to get the Pagerank to show up in my browser.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
